Monsters / roles
Locust identity plus Guilt and Organator product names
Verified product type, ability kits, role rules, and comparable use cases
HELDRanking desk · checked Aug 29, 2026
MM2 of The Locust tier list: monsters and powers status
The Locust is a confirmed game identity, while Guilt and Organator are observed product names at R$499 and R$399. Their types and ability kits are not verified, so this page keeps rankings held and sends purchase questions to the evidence-labelled shop guide.
FIELD NOTENOT RANK-READYChecked Aug 29, 2026
Current decision
RANKS HELDHold S/A/B placements until the named products have comparable kits.
Names and prices now exist, but product type, role access, abilities, duration, and repeatable performance do not. Ranking Guilt, Organator, or the Locust from price or name alone would not help a player decide.
Confidence: high that rankings are not supportable from the evidence checked August 29, 2026.
01
Readiness ledger
Named products exist; comparable evidence does not
A product name and price are useful catalog facts, but a tier list still needs multiple options and fields that matter to the real game loop.
FamilyPublic nowRequired before rankingState
Traits / abilities
No comparable candidates
Names, effects, tradeoffs, scaling, and current-build context
HELDTeams / combos
No formal team rules
Team size, slots, synergies, constraints, and replacement options
HELDEquipment
Future powers announced
Named items, effects, availability, values, and comparable use cases
HELD02
Current named records
What is known about the three visible monster or power terms
These are not tier placements. Each card states the strongest supportable answer.
THE LOCUSTOfficial
Named central threat
The public description and media establish the identity. A complete official ability kit is not published.
GUILTObserved
R$499 product
Type, ability, permanence, controls, and value remain unverified.
ORGANATORObserved
R$399 product
The spelling and price are observed; its product type and ability kit remain unverified.
DECISIONUnverified
No ranking yet
Price is not strength. Wait for current HUD evidence and repeatable comparison fields.
03
Future ranking method
The five questions every placement must answer
Price or rarity alone will never be enough if the game later exposes roles, costs, modes, or synergy.
- 01
Who or what is being ranked?
Exact name, content family, availability, and current-build identity.
- 02
What problem does it solve?
Orientation, survival, pressure handling, utility, support, movement, or another documented job.
- 03
What does it cost or replace?
Unlock requirement, slot, limitation, and realistic substitute.
- 04
Where does it work?
Mode, map, group size, role, and any important constraint.
- 05
Why is the placement current?
Build date, public change, repeatable observation, and comparative reason.
04
Evidence rows
What each candidate family still needs
05
Team handling
A best combo needs more than multiple players
No formal team size, role system, loadout slots, synergy rules, or group constraints are publicly documented. If those fields appear, team guidance will compare role coverage, slot pressure, coordination cost, and replacement risk—not simply stack the highest individual ranks.
Use the communication-aware run plannerLimitations:
The page cannot compare unnamed candidates or hidden mechanics. It gives a game-specific comparison framework, evaluates each plausible candidate family, explains the team-combo boundary, and defines the public events that will turn the hold into useful rankings.
06
Changed since last check
Ranking desk record
AUG 29, 2026
Added named product evidence without ranking it
Recorded Guilt at R$499 and Organator at R$399, linked the shop guide, and kept placements held because types and ability kits remain unverified.
07
FAQ
Ranking questions
What is the best character in MM2 of The Locust?
The Locust is named and Guilt plus Organator appear as observed products, but their comparable types, abilities, costs, and use cases are not verified well enough for an honest ranking.
Why not publish placeholder S, A, and B tiers?
A tier list needs real candidates and game-specific comparison fields. Empty labels or invented candidates would look complete while giving players no defensible decision.
Can announced equipment powers be ranked?
Not yet. The public description names the future content family but does not publish item names, effects, availability, values, or release timing.
When will rankings be added?
After the exact experience exposes at least two comparable candidates plus mode, role, cost, synergy, and current-build context that can support a useful reason for each placement.
Continue